SynthesisHealth promotion international2025
Mixed methods systematic review of consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education.
Synthesis in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Every VoiceCAN: the journey and contributions of a grassroots regional cancer advisory network.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Questions for more insightful and useful analyses of barriers and facilitators to public involvement and engagement in health research: a critical narrative review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Laying the Foundations for Co-Design: A Micro-Community Engagement Approach to Patient and Public Involvement in Rural Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Enhancing Care Coordination and Patient Engagement Through Electronic Medical Record Utilization in Primary Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Implementation strategies for evidence-based healthcare interventions in rural and remote settings: a scoping review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education. It was conducted using the JBI mixed methods methodology, specifically the convergent integrated approach. PubMed, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched, along with gray literature sources-Google, ProQuest Dissertation, and Theses Global. Primary research studies published globally in English, from 2011 to 2024 were included. Dual reviewer screening occurred in two stages, title and abstract, then followed by full text. Critical appraisals of included studies were undertaken using McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool for quantitative and qualitative studies, respectively, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Extracted data was synthesized to develop themes for reporting per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This review identified 25 studies that explored the top three levels of consumer involvement in rural healthcare settings, namely Partnership, Involving, and Consumer-led, adapted from the 2011 National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Five key themes were developed from the data: positive impacts of co-design, importance of relationship building, sustainability of interventions, power issues in co-design, and the importance of context. Findings showed that interventions utilizing the top three partnership levels (consumer-led, partnership, and involving) consistently lead to positive impacts on health outcomes of rural communities with higher levels of sustained engagement. Enablers and barriers were identified and categorized into a macro, micro, and meso framework for direct comparison between studies. Rural healthcare initiatives involving consumer engagement appear to have several benefits including strengthening community-researcher relationships, enhanced sustainability, and enriching local contexts while addressing power imbalances to enhance healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.