Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40878343›Full record

Observational studyThe Indian journal of medical research2025

Quality of life post-COVID recovery: A prospective observational study, North India.

Amod Laxmikant Borle, Mongjam Meghachandra Singh, Gurmeet Singh, Nidhi Bhatnagar, Shivani Rao, Tanya Singh, Binita Goswami, Sarika Singh, Sumeet Singla, Tanu Anand

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amod Laxmikant BorleDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Mongjam Meghachandra SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Gurmeet SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Nidhi BhatnagarDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Shivani RaoDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Tanya SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Binita GoswamiDepartment of Biochemistry, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Sarika SinghDepartment of Pathology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Sumeet SinglaDepartment of Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Tanu AnandDivision of Development Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on global health. While most research has focused on the acute phase, long-term effects on survivors' quality of life (QoL) remain less understood. Persistent symptoms post-recovery highlight a critical gap in understanding the pandemic's impact on survivors. This study aims to evaluate the QoL of COVID-19 recovered individuals in Delhi, India, at baseline and after six months of recovery using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief version (WHO-QOL BREF) Scale. Methods This prospective observational study spanned 15 months from May 2022 to July 2023 and covered 11 districts of Delhi. The study included 369 adults who recovered from COVID-19 at least 14 days prior and within the preceding six months. Participants were assessed at baseline and six months post-recovery using the WHO-QoL BREF Scale, measuring physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. Data was described in QoL scores. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Wilcoxon signed Rank test were used; a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among 369 participants, 50.1 per cent were male and 49.9 per cent female. Baseline QoL scores showed no significant differences between participants with and without post-COVID syndrome (PCoVS). However, six months later, non-PCoVS participants reported significantly better scores in physical (P=0.004), psychological (P<0.001), social (P=0.002), and environmental health (P=0.003). Better QoL was associated with males, younger age, higher education, and absence of comorbidities. Interpretation & conclusions PCoVS significantly impacts survivors' QoL, necessitating continuous monitoring and tailored interventions to support recovery. This study underscores the importance of addressing long-term consequences to improve public health outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Quality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SurvivorsComplicationsCOVID-19persistent symptomspost COVID syndromequality of lifesequelae

Identifiers

PMID40878343
PMCPMC12550382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.