Observational studyThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Quality of life post-COVID recovery: A prospective observational study, North India.
Observational study in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on global health. While most research has focused on the acute phase, long-term effects on survivors' quality of life (QoL) remain less understood. Persistent symptoms post-recovery highlight a critical gap in understanding the pandemic's impact on survivors. This study aims to evaluate the QoL of COVID-19 recovered individuals in Delhi, India, at baseline and after six months of recovery using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief version (WHO-QOL BREF) Scale. Methods This prospective observational study spanned 15 months from May 2022 to July 2023 and covered 11 districts of Delhi. The study included 369 adults who recovered from COVID-19 at least 14 days prior and within the preceding six months. Participants were assessed at baseline and six months post-recovery using the WHO-QoL BREF Scale, measuring physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. Data was described in QoL scores. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Wilcoxon signed Rank test were used; a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among 369 participants, 50.1 per cent were male and 49.9 per cent female. Baseline QoL scores showed no significant differences between participants with and without post-COVID syndrome (PCoVS). However, six months later, non-PCoVS participants reported significantly better scores in physical (P=0.004), psychological (P<0.001), social (P=0.002), and environmental health (P=0.003). Better QoL was associated with males, younger age, higher education, and absence of comorbidities. Interpretation & conclusions PCoVS significantly impacts survivors' QoL, necessitating continuous monitoring and tailored interventions to support recovery. This study underscores the importance of addressing long-term consequences to improve public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.