Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40878322›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025

The Differential Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.

Daniel Schmitz, Albrecht Stenzinger, Robert Grützmann, Irene Esposito, Hans-Jürgen Raatschen, Thomas Theodor Werner Seufferlein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel SchmitzDepartment of Gastroenterology and Infectiology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, University Campus of Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Surgery, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Radiology, Pediatric and Neuroradiology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, University Campus of Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Albrecht Stenzinger
Robert Grützmann
Irene Esposito
Hans-Jürgen Raatschen
Thomas Theodor Werner Seufferlein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of pancreatic cyst lesions in the general population worldwide is 16%. The majority of these cysts are intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which are associated with a risk of developing pancreatic cancer. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge of the differential diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic neoplasms.

methodsThis narrative review is based on a selective search for pertinent literature (1 January 2014 to 9 January 2025).

resultsMost cysts are less than 10 mm in diameter and have practically no potential for malignant transformation. If a small cyst remains unchanged in the absence of risk factors, monitoring can be ended five years after initial detection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the best method of characterizing and following up such lesions. If the diagnosis is unclear, endosonography should be performed. For IPMN, the most common type of pancreatic cystic neoplasm, the international Kyoto guideline 2024 contains a revised management algorithm based on risk factors. IPMN with high-grade dysplasia is an ideal indication for surgical resection. Serous cystic adenomas should generally not be operated on, and mucinous cystic neoplasia or a cystic neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas should be operated on only if it has reached a certain size. Minimally inva - sive and parenchyma-sparing techniques are now being increasingly used in pancreatic surgery.

conclusionOncological criteria as well as potential surgical risks and long-term sequelae must enter into the decision whether a pancreatic lesion should be resected. Exocrine and endocrine insufficiency are relevant and sometimes irreversible complications.

Indexed as

Pancreatic CystPancreatic NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialEndosonographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40878322
PMCPMC12693675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.