ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2025
The 30-Day Risk of Sudden Death in Patients With Epilepsy: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence That Changes Clinical Neurology Practice: Translating Algorithms Into Actionable Care.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Best Practices in Clinical Epilepsy Symposium | Mortality in Epilepsy: Challenges and Interventions.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Re: Comments on "The 30-Day Risk of Sudden Death in Patients With Epilepsy: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study".Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Comments on: "The 30-Day Risk of Sudden Death in Patients With Epilepsy: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study".Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy: From Short-Term Risk Prediction to Mechanistic Insights and Preventive Strategies.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeEpilepsy is associated with increased risk of sudden death (SD). The risk factors of developing SD in patients with epilepsy are not fully addressed. This study aimed to develop and validate a short-term prediction model for SD in patients with epilepsy using nationwide data from Taiwan.
methodsA retrospective cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database from 2011 to 2020. It focused on epilepsy patients over 18 years old who were prescribed anti-seizure medication (ASM). The study evaluated patient comorbidities, medication adherence, and recent hospital admissions. It aimed to assess the association between these factors and the occurrence of SD within 30 days. The analysis used a multiple logistic regression model and decision-tree classifier and assessed predictive accuracy using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsOut of 161,773 treatment events, 3,454 SD events were identified (2.1%). Factors associated with increased risk of SD included older age, intensive care unit admission, chronic kidney disease, psychotic disorder, poor ASM adherence (medication possession rate <0.5), and recent intravenous ASM use. The logistic model's area under curve was 0.752 in the 2020 testing dataset, and the testing dataset's sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.569, 0.832, 3.391, 0.518, and 6.543, respectively. A calibration curve showed reasonable alignment between predicted and observed probabilities of SD.
conclusionsPatients with epilepsy recently admitted to the hospital, showing poor ASM compliance and using intravenous ASMs, face an increased risk of SD within 30 days. Improving ASM adherence and treatment optimization may reduce this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.