Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40878047›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary anthropology2025

Cooperative Breeding as a Likely Early Catalyst of Human Evolution.

Judith M Burkart, Paola Cerrito, Giancarlo Natalucci, Carel P van Schaik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Agentic processes in cultural evolution: relevance to Anthropocene sustainability.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The developmental support hypothesis: adaptive plasticity in neural development in response to cues of social support.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. The human life history is adapted to exploit the adaptive advantages of culture.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Cognitive consequences of our grandmothering life history: cultural learning begins in infancy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Judith M BurkartDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-525X
Paola CerritoDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7015-8378
Giancarlo NatalucciDepartment of Neonatology, Family Larsson-Rosenquist Center for Neurodevelopment, Growth and Nutrition of the Newborn, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0225-2431
Carel P van SchaikDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-4509

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement No 101001295 (JB), and the NCCR Evolving Language, Swiss National Science Foundation Agreement no. 51NF40_180888 (JB and CvS) and the Forschungskredit of the University of Zurich (PC).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike any other great ape, humans give birth to large, secondarily altricial babies, show precocial social development, have bigger brains that require a long maturation period, and engage in cooperative breeding (CB). These traits, which characterize the human adaptive complex, are intricately linked and must have mutually reinforced each other over evolutionary time. Here, we use recent evidence from paleontology, developmental psychology, and pediatrics, complemented with comparative analyses, to ask what may have triggered this coevolutionary feedback loop: bipedality, direct selection on altriciality, a higher-quality diet, or cooperative breeding. An early adoption of extensive allomaternal care during human evolution, that is, the CB-first model, best accommodates the available data. In particular, CB was a catalyst enabling further increases in brain size, because even though larger brains slow down life history and neurodevelopment and thus lead to a demographic dilemma, CB enabled the necessary increase in birth rates.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainCooperative BehaviorHominidaeAnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalFemaleHumansMalealtercentrismbipedalitybrain size evolutioncooperative breedingneurodevelopmentsecondary altriciality

Identifiers

PMID40878047
PMCPMC12394790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.