ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025
Feasibility and acceptability of a two-phase survey for estimating the prevalence of mental disorders in adults with type 1 diabetes.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe assessed the feasibility and acceptability of conducting an epidemiological survey to estimate the distribution of mental disorders in a sample of adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D).
methodsEligible participants were adults with T1D recruited from four general practices in southeast England. Phase 1 included screening measures for mental disorders in the DSM-5. Participants at phase 1 were invited to a structured clinical interview for DSM-5 at phase 2. Feasibility parameters included the proportions of those identified as eligible, consenting, and completing either or both phases, and acceptability.
resultsThe study population comprised 146 adults with T1D. 72% (n = 105) had correct contact details, were eligible and invited. 52% (n = 55) completed phase 1, of which 45% (n = 25) completed phase 2. Some measures had high rates of missing values and three mental disorders had concordant phase 1-2 pairs, namely schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, depressive disorders, and substance-related and addictive disorders.
conclusionsConducting a two-phase survey of mental disorders in people with T1D is feasible and acceptable and can be improved using methods to update current contact details; adding secondary care diabetes services (hospitals) as recruitment sites; reducing the screening measures; and omitting diagnostic interviews for those mental disorders already listed in routine medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.