Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877954›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025

Retrosynthetic crosstalk between single-step reaction and multi-step planning.

Junseok Choe, Hajung Kim, Yan Ting Chok, Mogan Gim, Jaewoo Kang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junseok Choe *Department of Computer Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hajung Kim *Department of Computer Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yan Ting ChokDepartment of Computer Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Mogan GimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, South Korea. gimmogan@hufs.ac.kr.
Jaewoo KangDepartment of Computer Science, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea. kangj@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2023R1A2C3004176The Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HR20C0021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrosynthesis-the process of deconstructing complex molecules into simpler, more accessible precursors-is a cornerstone of drug discovery and material design. While machine learning has improved single-step retrosynthesis prediction, generating complete multi-step retrosynthetic routes remains challenging. In this study, we explore the integration of single-step retrosynthesis models with various planning algorithms to improve multi-step retrosynthetic route generation. We expand the exploration space beyond previously limited settings by incorporating combinations of planning algorithms and single-step retrosynthesis models and diverse datasets, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of retrosynthetic strategies. We evaluated synthetic routes based on both solvability, the ability to generate a complete route, and route feasibility, which reflects their practical executability in the laboratory. Our findings show that the model combination with the highest solvability does not always produce the most feasible routes, underscoring the need for more nuanced evaluation. Through a systematic analysis of combinations of planning algorithms and single-step retrosynthesis models, their performance across different datasets, and various practical metrics, our study provides a more comprehensive evaluation of retrosynthetic planning strategies. These insights contribute to a better understanding of computational retrosynthesis and its alignment with real-world applicability.

Indexed as

Multi-step retrosynthetic planningRetrosynthesisRetrosynthetic feasibilitySingle-step retrosynthesis prediction

Identifiers

PMID40877954
PMCPMC12392614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.