ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Ancient and dominant: a novel feline immunodeficiency virus subtype "X-EGY" identified in Egyptian cats associated with high prevalence.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical insights into Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum-associated anaemia in naturally infected cats: flea-associated risk and paradoxical clinicopathological findings.Irish veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Field evaluation of two commercial feline immunodeficiency virus antibody detection point-of-care kits in domestic cats.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Feline immunodeficiency virus: current insights into pathogenesis, clinical impact, and advances in treatment and vaccine development.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on the epidemiology and molecular characterization of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) in Egypt are limited. This study aimed to estimate FIV prevalence in 240 Egyptian cats during 2022–2024 using three diagnostic techniques: two point-of-care antibody detection kits (Anigen® and SNAP®) and one end-point PCR targeting the env gene. FIV infection is defined as positivity in at least two of the three diagnostic methods or PCR alone confirmed by sequencing, Additionally, FIV-associated clinicopathological abnormalities were assessed, and, for the first time in Egypt, circulating FIV subtypes were identified through partial sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of all env gene-positive samples (n = 10), along with 4 additional gag gene-positive samples.
resultsUsing our diagnostic criteria, 76 of 240 cats (31.7%) were identified as FIV-infected. Of these 76 cases, 75 were positive on both rapid kits, yielding a sensitivity of 98.7% for sequential testing with Anigen® and SNAP®, whereas only 10 were positive on PCR and sequencing (13.2% sensitivity). FIV-infected cats exhibited lymphopenia, thrombocytosis, hyperglobulinemia, and reduced albumin/globulin ratios. On env and gag gene-based phylogenetic analyses, Egyptian strains did not cluster with any known FIV subtype (A-F and U-NZenv) but formed a distinct, previously uncharacterized clade. The Egyptian env sequences displayed low intra-group diversity (2.8–3.7%) but high divergence from all known subtypes (21–25%), with no evidence of recombination observed. Moreover, these env sequences were derived from both shelter-housed and client-owned cats across three Egyptian governorates within a one-year period.
conclusionGiven their genetic distinctiveness and widespread detection, we propose a novel FIV subtype, tentatively designated “X-EGY.” Its dominance and limited variability among its strains suggest it represents an ancient lineage uniquely adapted to Egyptian cats, rather than a recently emerged variant. This subtype may partly contribute to Egypt’s notably high FIV prevalence. Serological testing, utilizing two point-of-care kits in screening and confirmation steps, is the most accurate FIV diagnostic approach, outperforming molecular testing, particularly in regions where genetic data on circulating strains are scarce. Overall, the findings enhance our understanding of FIV epidemiology and diagnostic strategies and offer new insights into viral diversity and evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.