ArticleBMC health services research2025
Gender disparities in Australia's specialist digital health workforce: a cross-sectional study on education and occupation.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital transformation is rapidly changing healthcare delivery, which is changing the functions and responsibilities of the health workforce. The specialist digital health workforce support the frontline clinical workforce through the management of health data and information systems. Gender disparity in this new configuration of the healthcare workforce can undermine organisational aims, workforce wellbeing, equitable care, population health, patient experience, and economic sustainability. RESEARCH
aimThe aim of this paper was to identify the nature of existing gender disparities and potential strategies for fostering gender equity in Australia's specialist digital health workforce.
methodsThe 2023 Australian Specialist Digital Health Workforce Census incorporated gender survey questions from the Telstra Health Understanding Gender Diversity in Australia's Digital Health Sector Special Report 2021-22 for the first time. These data were statistically analysed, examining if there was a difference between women and men in: (1) Education, (2) Professional development, (3) Occupation, and (4) Workforce intention.
resultsThere were 857 valid responses, of which 595 (69.43%) respondents identified as woman. Women were less likely than men to have a formal digital health qualification. They were less likely to occupy higher paid roles, where both had formal qualifications. Women have fewer opportunities for mentoring and leadership training than men. Men indicated more senior roles than women, and more men were healthcare practitioners than women. More men than women aimed for senior management roles. Both valued work-life balance in employment. Barriers to career progression included age, financial constraints, outside of work responsibilities. DISCUSSION: Gender disparities are a workforce issue in the Australian digital health landscape. Women are underrepresented in digital health roles, particularly in technology-related roles and analytics. Women have fewer opportunities for leadership training, which is particularly notable as they occupy fewer leadership roles and fewer aspire to leadership roles. Equitable care should be considered one aspect of equity within the workforce. Policy interventions, mentorship and networking, educational reform, and changes in organisation culture are suggested strategies for balancing gender in the digital health specialist workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.