Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877895›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025

AdapTor: Adaptive Topological Regression for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling.

Yixiang Mao, Souparno Ghosh, Ranadip Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yixiang MaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Souparno GhoshDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NB, 68588, USA.
Ranadip PalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. Ranadip.Pal@ttu.edu.

Funding

Leidos Biomed/NCI 22X049US National Science Foundation 2007418US National Science Foundation 2007903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling has become a critical tool in drug design. Recently proposed Topological Regression (TR), a computationally efficient and highly interpretable QSAR model that maps distances in the chemical domain to distances in the activity domain, has shown predictive performance comparable to state-of-the-art deep learning-based models. However, TR's dependence on simple random sampling-based anchor selection and utilization of radial basis function for response reconstruction constrain its interpretability and predictive capacity. To address these limitations, we propose Adaptive Topological Regression (AdapToR) with adaptive anchor selection and optimization-based reconstruction. We evaluated AdapToR on the NCI60 GI50 dataset, which consists of over 50,000 drug responses across 60 human cancer cell lines, and compared its performance to Transformer CNN, Graph Transformer, TR, and other baseline models. The results demonstrate that AdapToR outperforms competing QSAR models for drug response prediction with significantly lower computational cost and greater interpretability as compared to deep learning-based models.

Indexed as

Cancer drug response predictionDrug discoveryInterpretable machine-learningQSAR modelingTopological regression

Identifiers

PMID40877895
PMCPMC12392520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.