Trial reportGenome medicine2025
Integrating breast cancer polygenic risk scores at scale in the WISDOM Study: a national randomized personalized screening trial.
Trial report in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02620852 (Enabling a Paradigm Shift), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enabling a Paradigm Shift: A Preference-Tolerant RCT of Personalized vs. Annual Screening for Breast Cancer (Wisdom Study)
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Combining genome-wide polygenic scores with registry data for colorectal cancer risk-based screening.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical implementation of polygenic risk scores-updates on ancestry-adjusted PRS and their use in practice.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- A mixed-methods exploration of stakeholder experiences and perspectives on integrating polygenic breast cancer risk scores into Swedish clinical practice.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores in clinical applications - opportunities and challenges.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026Article
- Breast cancer polygenic risk score performance varies by socioeconomic status.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- WISDOM randomized trial comparing risk-based versus annual breast cancer screening: study cohort characteristics and design.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Perspectives from a multi-stakeholder workshop for implementing a risk-stratified breast cancer screening program in Canada.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Healthcare professionals' experiences returning monogenic, polygenic, and integrated risk results in the eMERGE study.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- WISDOM Randomized Trial Comparing Risk-Based Versus Annual Breast Cancer Screening: Study Cohort Characteristics and Design.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Women Informed to Screen Depending On Measures of risk (WISDOM) Study is the first prospective, population-wide application of personalized breast cancer screening. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of the study's novel use of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to tailor screening, evaluate our strategy for adapting PRSs to diverse populations, and quantify the impact of incorporating PRS on the study's screening recommendations.
methodsWISDOM is a randomized, preference-tolerant screening trial in the USA testing the safety and morbidity of risk-based versus annual screening in women aged 40-74 without a prior history of breast cancer. This early report includes participants in the risk-based arm only and compares screening recommendations generated by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) clinical risk model alone versus the BCSC model modified by a PRS (BCSC-PRS). The main outcome of interest is the proportion of participants with a change in screening recommendation after integrating PRS for risk stratification.
resultsIn the risk-based arm, 21,631 participants received a PRS. Small but statistically significant differences in the PRS were seen between major racial and ethnic groups (p < 0.001), and higher PRS was associated with greater extent of family history (p < 0.001) and denser breasts (p < 0.001). BCSC-PRS risk estimates changed the screening recommendations for 14% of women aged 40-49 compared to BCSC alone and for 10% of women aged 50-74. Projected net screening encounters at the population level were similar for both age groups.
conclusionsIn a first-in-kind application of PRS to inform breast cancer screening approaches, we demonstrate feasibility for scaled implementation, moderate changes to individual screening recommendations, and minimal projected downstream burden on the healthcare system.
trial registrationProspectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02620852 on 12/2/2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.