Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877870›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2025

The impact of clinical simulation on bridging the theory-practice gap in nursing education: a systematic review.

Majid Daneshfar, Hossein Karimi Moonaghi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploring final-year nursing students' experiences in dysphagia management at an Eastern Cape University.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Majid DaneshfarStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, Islamic Republic of. daneshfar_majid90@yahoo.com.
Hossein Karimi MoonaghiMedical Sciences Education Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, Islamic Republic of. Karimih@mums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBridging the gap between theoretical instruction and practical competence remains a central challenge in nursing education. Nursing students often struggle to transfer classroom-acquired knowledge into real-world clinical environments, resulting in decreased confidence, impaired decision-making, and compromised patient care. Clinical simulation has emerged as a promising pedagogical tool to address this longstanding theory-practice gap by recreating realistic scenarios in a controlled setting.

methodThis systematic review synthesized studies published from 2010 to 2025 concerning the use of clinical simulation in nursing education. Five databases were searched using defined keywords to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies focused on simulation-based interventions aimed at enhancing nursing students' clinical competence, decision-making, confidence, and knowledge transfer. Data extraction was independently performed by reviewers, and methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2, CASP, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklists. A thematic synthesis approach was employed to analyze both qualitative and quantitative findings.

resultsOf the fifteen included studies, twelve reported significant improvements in nursing students' clinical decision-making, judgment, or self-confidence, involving over 1,100 participants. High-fidelity simulation and structured scenario-based interventions were particularly effective in enhancing core competencies such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), infection control, and diagnostic reasoning. Thematic synthesis categorized findings into six domains: clinical decision-making, clinical judgment, learner self-confidence, empathy development, experiential learning, and learner satisfaction. Reported challenges included limited technological access, inconsistent debriefing, and insufficient faculty training. No adverse outcomes were noted, although potential publication bias and short follow-up durations were identified as limitations.

conclusionSimulation-based education can serve as an effective and scalable strategy to reduce the theory-practice gap in nursing education. Its success depends on sustained implementation, institutional support, and pedagogical integration. Future research should emphasize long-term effectiveness and explore context-specific barriers.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, NursingSimulation TrainingClinical Decision-MakingHumansStudents, NursingClinical simulationNursing educationSystematic review.Theory–practice gap

Identifiers

PMID40877870
PMCPMC12392514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.