ArticleBMC neurology2025
Use of MRI-double inversion recovery sequence for early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: case series.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The choice of additional Double Inversion Recovery (DIR) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sequences may affect the judgment of the presence and nature of lesions. Herein, we reported three cases initially presenting with non-typical multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms, in which the final diagnosis of MS was confirmed after incorporating spinal cord and brain DIR MRI sequence. The sequence revealed more conspicuous lesions compared to conventional T2-weighted imaging or T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2WI/FLAIR) sequences. Consequently, the patients received an earlier definitive diagnosis and timely treatment. Our cases demonstrated the additional DIR sequences for the patients with non-typical MS symptoms were reasonable and may be helpful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.