ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Linguistic factors and COVID-19 outcomes among long-term care residents in Ontario, Canada.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected frail individuals, especially those living in long-term care (LTC) homes. This study examined the role of linguistic factors on COVID-19 related outcomes in LTC homes.
methodsWe performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study of residents living in LTC homes in Ontario, Canada who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Resident language, obtained from LTC assessments, was used to classify residents into one of the three linguistic groups: Anglophone (English), Francophone (French), and allophone (other language). Language of the LTC home was determined using a person-time representation of the languages spoken by residents within each LTC home. We defined LTC facilities as French homes when Francophone residents contributed more than 25% of the person-days, and allophone homes when allophone residents contributed more than 50% of the person-days. Residents whose language corresponded to the language of the LTC home in which they were living were said to have received language-concordant care, while all other residents were said to have received language-discordant care. The outcomes of this study were ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality within 90 days.
resultsWe included a total of 26,829 LTC residents (20,315 Anglophones, 1,032 Francophones, and 5,482 allophones) living in 572 LTC homes (502 English, 28 French, 42 allophone) who were diagnosed with COVID-19. LTC residents who lived in language-discordant homes were more likely to have ED visits (adjusted HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25) and hospitalizations (adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29) when compared to LTC residents who lived in language-concordant homes. Residents-facility language discordance was not associated with overall mortality (adjusted HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.10) or in hospital mortality (adjusted HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.88-1.23).
conclusionResidents living in language-discordant LTC facilities experienced more ED visits and hospitalizations following diagnosis of COVID-19. The findings of this study highlight the importance of providing frail, vulnerable individuals with linguistically concordant care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.