ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
The impact of maternal chronic stress on spontaneous preterm birth: evidence from a Chinese cohort study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prenatal allostatic load and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond the battlefield: an analysis of the war-related health impacts in the Gaza strip, Palestine.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to examine the relationship between maternal chronic stress, measured as allostatic load (AL), and the subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).
methodsThis analysis was based on a prospective, single-center cohort study conducted in China. Eligible women were recruited during their second trimester and followed up until giving birth. AL was estimated at enrollment by using 10 biomarkers that reflect cardiovascular, metabolic, immune, and neuroendocrine dysregulation. High AL group was defined as women with AL score greater than the upper sample quartile. Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify underlying AL patterns among pregnant women. Logistic regressions were employed to test the association between AL and sPTB. Additionally, the dose-response associations between AL score and sPTB were evaluated by using a 3-knot restricted cubic spline (RCS).
results637 pregnant women with a mean AL score of 2.6 ± 1.7 (mean ± SD) were included in this study. Among these participants, 175 (27.5%) were classified into the high AL group (AL score ≥ 4). The sPTB rate was 6.6%. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant positive association between AL score and sPTB (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.07-1.52, P = 0.007). Similarly, women in the high AL group had significantly higher sPTB risk compared with those in the low AL group (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.08-3.99, P = 0.025). LCA yielded three AL latent classes: (1) low dysregulation class, (2) metabolic-immune dysregulation class, and (3) cardiovascular dysregulation class. When compared with the low dysregulation class, the metabolic-immune dysregulation class was significantly associated with sPTB (OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.18-5.49, P = 0.014). RCS showed there was an obvious dose-dependent association between increased AL score and risk of sPTB.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence that AL during pregnancy is associated with the risk of sPTB, especially the metabolic-immune dysregulation class of AL. Evaluating AL and chronic stress during pregnancy may be potential tools to identify pregnant women at high risk of sPTB. Further work is needed to validate these findings in larger or diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.