ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Does palliative care improve the quality of life for cancer patients in three tertiary hospitals in South Africa?
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality of life (QoL) is a crucial treatment outcome for cancer patients, who often experience significant symptom burden and distress. Despite its benefits, access to palliative care remains limited in many settings, including South Africa. This study assessed changes in QoL before and after palliative care interventions and examined factors associated with QoL improvements.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted among cancer patients referred for palliative care at three tertiary hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa. Interdisciplinary teams provided palliative care, and patient data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected. QoL was measured using the World Health Organization Quality Of Life-BREF (WHOQOL BREF) tool at baseline and follow-up. Paired t-tests compared mean QoL scores, and mixed regression analysis identified factors associated with QoL improvements. Data were analyzed using Stata version 18 SE.
resultsAmong 724 patients (68.51% female, mean age 51.78 years, SD: 16.62), the most common cancers were breast (29.83%), gastrointestinal/hepatobiliary (21.27%), and cervical (16.71%). Baseline QoL mean (SD) scores were low across all domains. Following palliative care, significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed: general health improved from 43.64 (26.17) to 66.28 (26.71); physical health from 48.46 (15.45) to 53.42 (15.08); psychological health from 57.54 (17.39) to 65.44 (18.75); environmental health from 60.97 (19.90) to 71.49 (18.84) and social health from 59.26 (25.60) to 71.08 (23.54) (all p < 0.001). HIV-negative status was associated with better outcomes across all domains, with coefficients ranging from 0.19 to 0.46 (p < 0.05) compared to those living with HIV.
conclusionsPalliative care significantly improved QoL across all measured domains among cancer patients at tertiary hospitals in Johannesburg. These findings highlight the need to integrate palliative care into routine oncology treatment to enhance patient well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.