SynthesisBMC medical research methodology2025
How have contemporary research studies used social media to recruit to digital self-help intervention research for young people's mental health?: a mapping review.
Synthesis in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparison of Participant Demographics Across Co-Designed Recruitment Methods to Two Student Mental Health Trials: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- How Australia's social media minimum age law may reshape research recruitment for adolescents under 16.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSelf-help, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are a scalable way to improve access to mental health support. Recruiting young people to research studies evaluating mental health interventions is vital for the development of effective interventions that can address the global needs-access gap. Given that many young people are digital natives, social media offers an opportunity for researchers to share study adverts. Yet, there is a lack of reporting on specifically how social media is being used for study recruitment into research studies, such as the content of posts and the frequency of posting. We aimed to map how studies evaluating self-help DMHIs for young people have used social media as a recruitment method.
methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed and APA PsycInfo (and supplementary searches on Google Scholar and Cochrane) databases from 2019 to 2024 to identify published studies reporting outcomes of self-help DMHIs for 10-24 year-olds. Data was extracted on what platforms researchers used to recruit, the frequency of posting, what kind of account (personal/institutional), and the narrative content posted in study advertisements. Findings were synthesised narratively, including descriptive counts and content analysis on text-based data.
resultsOf the 37 studies meeting inclusion criteria, 18 described using social media in recruitment. For five of these, social media was the exclusive recruitment strategy. Studies used a variety of social media platforms, most commonly Facebook and Instagram. Ten studies described when and/or how often they posted on social media, and six specified what type of social media account was used to post study adverts. Ten studies included the text narrative used on social media posts and these tended to include a catchy tagline, study information, and participant eligibility criteria.
conclusionsSocial media is a potential recruitment avenue. When it is used, detailing how it is used, including what platform, what content, how often, from what kind of account, and using what functionality is important for transparent reporting and reproducibility. Co-designing social media recruitment strategies with young people with living experience of using social media currently could help to align current usage patterns in the target demographic with recruitment activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.