Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877776›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Disparities between two possible thresholds for frequent contacts to a Norwegian emergency medical communication centre: ≥5 contacts in one month vs. ≥12 contacts in three months.

Astrid K V Harring, Magnus Hjortdahl, Kristin Häikiö, Trine M Jørgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Astrid K V HarringOslo Metropolitan University, PB 4, St. Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130, Norway. astridka@oslomet.no.
Magnus HjortdahlOslo Metropolitan University, PB 4, St. Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130, Norway.
Kristin HäikiöOslo Metropolitan University, PB 4, St. Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130, Norway.
Trine M JørgensenOslo Metropolitan University, PB 4, St. Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrequent callers are described as a challenge for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) across international contexts, but the terminology, definitions, and frequency vary. Until 2023, the UK’s Frequent Caller National Network (FreCaNN) definition was ≥ 5 incidents in one month or ≥ 12 incidents in three months. In this study we applied that definition to compare the two possible thresholds independently on data from Norway’s largest Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC).

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional database review of all patients who met the former FreCaNN definition of frequent contacts to the medical emergency number 1-1-3 at Oslo EMCC between 1. January 2017 and 31. December 2022, also including all ages, and instances where others called on behalf of a patient.

resultsA total of 19.559 unique identities met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 16.518 patients accumulated 130.814 contacts to the EMCC relating to individual episodes 5 or more times in one month, but fewer than 12 in three months. For the group with 12 or more contacts in three months, 3.041. patients accumulated 137.909 contacts. Almost all those with ≥ 12 contacts within three-months also met the ≥ 5 contacts in one month criterion. Those who had ≥ 12 contacts in three months tended to be significantly younger (median age: 58 vs. 70) and more likely to make the call themselves (64% vs. 32%). Regarding chief complaints, they had a higher frequency of “unidentified problems” (34% vs. 22%), “mental health problems” (20% vs. 8.2%), and “intoxication/OD” (7.2% vs. 4.4%) and were less likely to be prioritized as urgent (54% vs. 82%). An ambulance was less often dispatched (38% vs. 69%), and they were less often taken to either a doctor (17% vs. 25%) or to a hospital (13% vs. 32%) (all p < .001).

conclusionThese results show disparities and indicate that there are two distinct subgroups within the former FreCaNN definition. In the Norwegian context focusing on the ‘12 contacts in three months’ component allows for improved specificity and a more manageable number of individuals, for further research to identify effective targeted clinical measures to improve patient care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical Service Communication SystemsEmergency Medical ServicesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedNorwayRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsEmergency medical communication centreEmergency medical servicesFrequent callerPrehospital

Identifiers

PMID40877776
PMCPMC12395745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.