ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
Within-subject confidence intervals for pairwise differences in scatter plots.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Color discrimination in action: High-throughput measurement in immersive VR.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Filling-in of the foveal rod scotoma and confidence preference for central vision under mesopic viewing conditions.Vision research · 2026Article
- Simulated and natural changes in intraocular transparency selectively affect photoreceptor-specific pupil responses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Eye movements do not preferentially test inferences in the blind spot.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Melanopsin-mediated image statistics from natural and human-made environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Confidence in incomplete visual search.Visual cognition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scatter plots are a standard tool to illustrate the covariation of bivariate data. For paired observations of the same variable, they can also be used to illustrate differences in the central tendency. For these differences, it would be useful to draw confidence intervals (CIs) that correctly align with statistical analyses. Here, we describe a method to compute and draw a diagonal CI for pairwise differences in scatter plots. This CI can be compared to the identity line that marks coordinates with identical values in both observations. Such CIs offer advantages for both authors and readers: for authors, the CI is simple to compute and to draw; for readers, the CI is less ambiguous and more informative than other types of illustrations, because the three CIs of the standalone effects of x, y and their pairwise differences can be plotted simultaneously along horizontal, vertical and diagonal axes, respectively. A survey testing the interpretation of standalone effects and pairwise differences in bar and scatter plots by scientists showed that such effects can be interpreted with high certainty and accuracy from scatter plots containing horizonal and vertical CIs for standalone effects and diagonal CIs for pairwise differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.