Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877720›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Controlling unwanted memories: A conceptual review grounded in the process model of emotion regulation.

Agnieszka Bachfischer, Irina M Harris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Emotion regulation modulates subsequent control of unwanted memories.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agnieszka BachfischerSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Brennan MacCallum Building A18, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. a.bachfischer@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5065-5099
Irina M HarrisSchool of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Brennan MacCallum Building A18, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9777-2290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autobiographical memories are a crucial source of emotional states in our daily lives. While remembering negative events in the past is important to guide future behaviours and steer us away from harm, being reminded of unpleasant events too often or too intensely can have a serious impact on our wellbeing. A solution that may reconcile these positive and negative effects of negative memories is memory control. Being able to control when, how, and which memories to remember, based on our current goals, is similar to being able to control our emotions, which taps into the well-established field of emotion regulation (ER) where the ER Process Model (Gross, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224-237 1998b, Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1-26 2015) has been extensively used as a theoretical framework. The memory control field is missing such an overarching model that would provide a guiding framework and new insights for emotional memory control research and practice. In this conceptual review, we bring together three lines of well-established research - on Emotion Regulation, Involuntary Autobiographical Memories, and Memory Control - to demonstrate how the Process Model of ER can be applied to memories. The application of the ER model to emotional memories enhances conceptual clarity of the field of memory control, helps to organise existing findings, reveals meaningful similarities and differences between various memory control strategies, identifies the most potentially effective strategies, and points to the most promising future research directions.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationEmotionsMemory, EpisodicMental RecallModels, PsychologicalHumansEmotional memoriesEmotion regulationMemory control

Identifiers

PMID40877720
PMCPMC12627193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.