ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Sixth international consensus conference on sleeve gastrectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this consensus meeting and survey of international experts in obesity management was to establish a unified agreement on three key aspects of LSG: preoperative workup, intraoperative considerations, and the management of postoperative complications.
methodsThe content of this expert review was formulated and subjected to voting by a panel of leading specialists during the Sleeve Consensus Summit, held in Montpellier on 3rd and 4th of October 2024. Previous consensus conferences were analyzed to refine the questionnaires used in this study.
resultsA consensus rate above 70% among experts surveyed was reached for 35 out of 50 statements. The following indications for Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) were endorsed: adolescent (<18 years old) surgery (92%), elderly (>65 years old) patients (94%), best surgical option for patients with severe liver disease (81%), for patients requiring liver, kidney or heart transplant (100%) and as the best option for patients requiring complex abdominal wall reconstruction (85%). Dissection of the hiatus should not be performed routinely (75% consensus) but small (<3 cm) hiatal hernia discovered during surgery should be directly repaired by cruroplasty (83% consensus). For the endoscopic management of acute leak post SG in stable patients, endoscopic pigtail drainage was judged as the best first-line option (82%), above stenting (29%) or endoscopic suturing (18%). RYGB was deemed indicated for patients with sufficient weight loss and severe GERD (76%) and SADI was judged as the best surgical option for patients with poor weight loss without severe GERD (70%).
conclusionsLSG has become a safe, efficient and validated procedure during the last 25 years. Both the preoperative workup and intraoperative considerations are well standardized. Our focus in clinical practice should be concentrated to diminish the reflux, but also to offer a better option for revisional surgery following LSG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40877627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.