ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Characterization of an enriched acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria community from the sediment of a uranium mine (Minas Gerais-Brazil).
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sulfate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage: ecological constraints, microbial networks, and functional persistence.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are anaerobic microorganisms capable of precipitating metals and raising pH levels in acidic drainage waters. Limited genera have been isolated from acidic sediments. This study aimed to characterize enrichment cultures of acidophilic SRB communities found in uranium mine sediments in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Enrichment tests evaluated lactate and acetate as electron donors across various pH levels. Results revealed SRB growth in both carbon sources at pH 3, 4, and 5, with sulfate removal rates of approximately 98% for lactate and 97% for acetate. Notably, Desulfosporosinus was abundant (27%) in both carbon source assays. In the acetate experiment, Acidocella, an acidophilic acetoclastic microorganism, dominated (39%), alongside Desulfosporosinus (27%). The latter, typically exhibiting incomplete metabolism, might use hydrogen or other forms of extracellular electron transfer (EET), potentially including direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET), in syntrophy with Acidocella spp. The predominance of Desulfosporosinus spp. and Clostridium spp. in the enrichment cultures also suggests a cooperative metabolic network in which fermentative bacteria play a critical role in initiating sulfate reduction under acidic conditions. These findings underscore the efficacy of the native acidophilic SRB enrichment strategy, both in recovering indigenous strains and in generating a functionally effective inoculum for sulfidogenic bioreactor systems, operating at low pH. This approach holds promise for treating Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) and merits further scalable research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.