Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877595›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Development and evaluation of a clinical note summarization system using large language models.

Juliana Damasio Oliveira, Henrique D P Santos, Ana Helena D P S Ulbrich, Julia Colleoni Couto, Marcelo Arocha, Joaquim Santos, Manuela Martins Costa, Daniela Faccio, Fabio O Tabalipa, Rodrigo F Nogueira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juliana Damasio Oliveira *Institute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. juliana@noharm.ai.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-285X
Henrique D P Santos *Institute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Ana Helena D P S Ulbrich *Institute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Julia Colleoni Couto *Institute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Marcelo Arocha *Institute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Joaquim Santos *Institute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Manuela Martins CostaInstitute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Daniela FaccioInstitute of A.I. in Healthcare, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Fabio O TabalipaMemed, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Rodrigo F NogueiraMaritaca.ai, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical notes are a vital and detailed source of information about patient hospitalizations. However, the sheer volume and complexity of these notes make evaluation and summarization challenging. Nonetheless, summarizing clinical notes is essential for accurate and efficient clinical decision-making in patient care. Generative language models, particularly large language models such as GPT-4, offer a promising solution by creating coherent, contextually relevant text based on patterns learned from large datasets.

methodsThis study describes the development of a discharge summary system using large language models. By conducting an online survey and interviews, we gather feedback from end users, including physicians and patients, to ensure the system meets their practical needs and fits their experiences. Additionally, we develop a rating system to evaluate prompt effectiveness by comparing model-generated outputs with human assessments, which serve as benchmarks to evaluate the performance of the automated model.

resultsHere we show that the model's ability to interpret diagnoses borders on humanlevel accuracy, demonstrating its potential to assist healthcare professionals in routine tasks such as generating discharge summaries.

conclusionsThis advancement underscores the potential of large language models in clinical settings and opens up possibilities for broader applications in healthcare documentation and decision-making support.

Identifiers

PMID40877595
PMCPMC12394402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.