Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877526›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2025

Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies.

Mustafa Al Jnainati, Niharika Ikkurthy, Mohammad Ayoub, Areeba Shahid, Mirza Taha Baig, Muhammad Iltaf, Jana Al Jnainati

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustafa Al JnainatiUniversity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5520-809X
Niharika IkkurthyRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-0630
Mohammad AyoubUniversity of Roma Camillus, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0476-5585
Areeba ShahidJinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0835-3977
Mirza Taha BaigDow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8612-5474
Muhammad IltafAyub Teaching Hospital/Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-603X
Jana Al JnainatiUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. janajneinati01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7646-8249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuperior rectal artery embolization ("Emborrhoid") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids when office therapies fail or surgery is undesirable.

methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020, PubMed and Embase were searched (Jan 2014-Jan 2024). Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and applied RoB 2, ROBINS-I, or an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Prespecified outcomes were technical success, clinical success (≥ 2-point fall in bleeding score or equivalent), adverse events, and recurrence. Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; results were narratively synthesized.

resultsTwenty-two studies encompassing 810 procedures qualified. Technical success reached 93-100%. Clinical success ranged from 63 to 94%, yielding marked bleeding control and symptom relief. Reported complications were mild and self-limited (pelvic discomfort, nausea, and low-grade fever); no ischemic injury, continence disturbance, or mortality occurred. Recurrence necessitating repeat treatment affected 8-20% of patients, usually when collateral arterial supply persisted. Patient-reported satisfaction exceeded 80% in every series. Only two small, heterogeneous comparative studies versus rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy were available, precluding a pooled analysis.

conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests Emborrhoid is a safe, effective bridge between office procedures and surgery-particularly valuable for frail or anticoagulated patients. Yet small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity. Multicenter randomized studies with harmonized outcomes and ≥ 24-month follow-up are required to confirm long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and optimal patient selection.

Indexed as

ArteriesEmbolization, TherapeuticHemorrhoidsRectumHumansRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeEmbolic materialsHemorrhoidal embolizationMinimally invasive therapyPatient satisfactionRecurrence ratesSuperior rectal arterySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40877526
PMCPMC12394367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.