Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877477›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2025

Influenza vaccine strain selection with an AI-based evolutionary and antigenicity model.

Wenxian Shi, Jeremy Wohlwend, Menghua Wu, Regina Barzilay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Influenza vaccine-specific CD4NPJ vaccines · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenxian ShiDepartment of Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. wxsh@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9135-3680
Jeremy WohlwendDepartment of Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Menghua WuDepartment of Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Regina BarzilayDepartment of Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. regina@csail.mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-8201

Funding

United States Department of Defense | Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) HDTRA12110013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current vaccines provide limited protection against rapidly evolving viruses. For example, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates show that the overall influenza vaccine effectiveness against outpatient illness in the United States averaged below 40% between 2012 and 2021. Moreover, the clinical outcomes of a vaccine can be assessed only retrospectively. Here we propose an in silico method named VaxSeer that predicts the antigenic match of vaccine candidates with circulating viruses, in the context of the viruses' relative dominance in the future influenza season. Based on 10 years of retrospective evaluation using sequencing and antigenicity data, our approach consistently selects strains with better empirical antigenic matches to circulating viruses than annual recommendations. Finally, our predicted estimate of antigenic match exhibits a strong correlation with influenza vaccine effectiveness and reduction in disease burden, highlighting the promise of this framework to drive the vaccine selection process.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularHumansVaccine EfficacyAntigens, ViralInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40877477
PMCPMC12618262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.