ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental investigation of sensitivity changes during encapsulation of piezoelectric composite materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preliminary Study on Piezoelectric Sensor Signals Embedded in Polymeric Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piezoelectric (0-3) composites typically consist of a polymer matrix that contains piezoceramic particles. They can be used as sensors for structural health monitoring due to their lower acoustic impedance and ability to detect high-frequency waves. These composites have two thin electrodes on their surfaces, and cable connections that require electrical insulation. This insulation increases the durability of the sensor and provides additional protection. One way to achieve this is by encapsulating the sensor in polymer films. However, the sensitivity of the sensor may decrease due to an increase in overall stiffness after encapsulation, so this must also be evaluated. This study experimentally investigates and compares three different encapsulation designs with a non-encapsulated reference sample. The designs include (i) gluing and laminating the sensor onto a pre-prepared flexible printed circuit board, (ii) lamination of the sensor with polyethylene terephthalate, and (iii) lamination with polyetherimide. The sensitivity of the encapsulated sensors to low and high frequency vibrations was evaluated. The results show that an encapsulation sensor with adhesive tape and polyetherimide results in slightly lower sensitivity at lower frequencies, but almost no difference at higher frequencies. These results suggest that the proposed method is suitable for encapsulating sensors for use in structural health monitoring applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.