ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Comparative effectiveness of remote perioperative telemonitoring in cancer surgery: a randomized trial.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04596384 (Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Perioperative Telemonitoring for Functional Recovery and Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Perioperative Telemonitoring for Functional Recovery and Symptoms
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of digital health interventions for the management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of early discharge after robot-assisted uro-oncologic surgery using wearable telemonitoring.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Nurses as guardians of time: the hidden clinical value of continuous care in geriatrics.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This randomized trial compared remote perioperative telemonitoring (RPM) care versus surgeon only care in patients with gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), or gynecological (GYN) cancers (N = 293). The RPM care arm wore a wristband accelerometer and reported symptoms via a mobile application (app) before surgery and at days 7, 14, 30, 60, 90 post-discharge. Triage nurses telephoned patients when data deviated from predetermined thresholds. Participants in the surgeon only care arm used the device and app but received a standard institutional message when threshold deviations occurred. A 6% greater functional recovery rate was observed for participants in the RPM care arm (p = 0.036). Change in symptom severity scores was statistically significant at day 90 and for symptom interference with daily activities at days 14 and 90, favoring the RPM care arm. The RPM care arm experienced fewer major postoperative complications (p = 0.004). RPM care produced statistically significant benefits in postoperative functional recovery and symptoms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04596384, 10/22/2020.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.