Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877440›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Structure analysis in an octocopter using piezoelectric sensors and machine learning.

Andrzej Koszewnik, Bartłomiej Ambrożkiewicz, Daniel Ołdziej, Pawel Dzienis, Mateusz Pieciul, Arkadiusz Syta, Jacek Zaburko, Ghada Bouattour, Justinas Gargasas, Kristina Baziene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrzej KoszewnikBialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45C, Bialystok, 15-351, Poland. a.koszewnik@pb.edu.pl.
Bartłomiej AmbrożkiewiczLublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, Lublin, 20-618, Poland.
Daniel OłdziejBialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45C, Bialystok, 15-351, Poland.
Pawel DzienisBialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45C, Bialystok, 15-351, Poland.
Mateusz PieciulBialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45C, Bialystok, 15-351, Poland.
Arkadiusz SytaLublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, Lublin, 20-618, Poland.
Jacek ZaburkoLublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, Lublin, 20-618, Poland.
Ghada BouattourLeuphana University Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, Lüneburg, 21335, Germany.
Justinas GargasasVilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, Vilnius, LT-10223, Lithuania.
Kristina BazieneVilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, Vilnius, LT-10223, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a novel diagnostic methodology for assessing drive system damage and its propagation in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) using piezoelectric sensors mounted on each arm of the drone. In contrast to existing studies that focus solely on fault localization, this work investigates the spatial propagation of structural responses to localized motor faults under varying operating conditions. By varying the PWM control signal duty cycle on one motor, different degrees of damage (from 20% to 80%) were simulated. Voltage signals were recorded on each arm of the drone to identify damage and to optimize the number and placement of the sensors. Statistical features extracted in both the time and frequency domains were calculated within sliding time windows. These features (e.g., mean, variance, spectral skewness, spectral kurtosis) from voltage time-series were used as input data for machine learning models (e.g., Random Forest and K-Nearest Neighbors), which are widely applied in the diagnostics of rotary systems for binary classification problems (distinguishing between intact and damaged states of varying damage level). The highest classification accuracy was achieved for the arm where the electric motor failure was induced (from 93% to 94% depending on the degree of damage), while the lowest accuracy was obtained for the opposite arm (from 50% to 57% depending on the degree of damage). It was found that diagnostic accuracy increases when frequency-domain features of the signals are used, particularly for the opposite arms. The proposed methodology provides valuable insights into the structural behavior of the drone in both ground and flight conditions, illustrating the propagation of local damage to other components. The results contribute to the development of robust diagnostic techniques for health monitoring and structural reliability assessment of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

Indexed as

DataFailure detection and identificationFeature selectionPiezo-composite elementsStatistical learningStructural health monitoringUnmanned Aerial Vehicle

Identifiers

PMID40877440
PMCPMC12394715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.