Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877427›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Digital therapeutics for insomnia: an umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis.

Can Li, Qiyun Luo, Hong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Can LiSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qiyun LuoSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hong WuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. hongwu@hust.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72371111&72001087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing burden of insomnia underscores the necessity for accessible and effective treatments, with digital therapeutics offering a promising solution. A systematic search was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) covering the period from the inception of each database until October 2024. A total of 28 systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating digital therapeutics with reported insomnia-related outcomes were included, encompassing 118,970 participants. The primary outcome, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), indicated that digital therapeutics significantly improved insomnia (SMD = -0.42, p < 0.01), with better results observed during follow-up (SMD = -0.69, p < 0.01). Under the guidance of therapists, digital therapeutics exerted a more positive effect (SMD = -1.05, p < 0.01). The secondary outcomes also showed consistent results, with no significant differences observed in Total Sleep Time (TST) between the post-intervention and follow-up periods. Based on the assessment results, there is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of digital therapeutics.

Identifiers

PMID40877427
PMCPMC12394607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.