ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Digital therapeutics for insomnia: an umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effectiveness of digital therapeutics in improving sleep quality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Effects of Various Delivery Methods of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Among Patients With Cancers: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Psycho-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Therapeutic for Hwa-Byung (Korean Culture-Related Anger Syndrome) Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A Pilot Feasibility Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of digital and mobile-based interventions on sleep quality among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing burden of insomnia underscores the necessity for accessible and effective treatments, with digital therapeutics offering a promising solution. A systematic search was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) covering the period from the inception of each database until October 2024. A total of 28 systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating digital therapeutics with reported insomnia-related outcomes were included, encompassing 118,970 participants. The primary outcome, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), indicated that digital therapeutics significantly improved insomnia (SMD = -0.42, p < 0.01), with better results observed during follow-up (SMD = -0.69, p < 0.01). Under the guidance of therapists, digital therapeutics exerted a more positive effect (SMD = -1.05, p < 0.01). The secondary outcomes also showed consistent results, with no significant differences observed in Total Sleep Time (TST) between the post-intervention and follow-up periods. Based on the assessment results, there is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of digital therapeutics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.