Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877417›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impact of prompting on ChatGPT's adherence to status epilepticus treatment guidelines.

Paulina S C Kliem, Urs Fisch, Sira M Baumann, Sebastian Berger, Simon A Amacher, Sabina Hunziker, Raoul Sutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulina S C KliemClinic for Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Urs FischDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sira M BaumannClinic for Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Sebastian BergerClinic for Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Simon A AmacherClinic for Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Sabina HunzikerMedical Faculty of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Raoul SutterClinic for Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. raoul.sutter@usb.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed ChatGPT's adherence to established management guidelines for status epilepticus (SE) from major neurological societies (NCS, AES, EFNS) and examined how prompt specificity affected the quality of its recommendations. Four prompts varying in detail were each submitted four times, and the generated recommendations were analyzed for consistency with guidelines, along with an assessment of source relevance and accuracy. ChatGPT consistently recommended securing the airway and a breathing check (100% of responses) and always suggested benzodiazepines as first-line treatment. However, it rarely recommended key measures such as side positioning (25%) to prevent potential aspiration and neurological assessments (0-25%). Likewise, alternative administration routes for benzodiazepines were mentioned inconsistently (0-100%). While second- and third-line antiseizure medications were suggested consistently, proper dosage guidance was lacking when unprompted. EEG monitoring was recommended in 50-100%. More specific and detailed prompts increased guideline adherence most markedly regarding vital sign assessment (from 33 to 91%), correct dosages of second-line (from 50 to 100%), third-line drugs (from 0 to 100%), and screening for complications (from 0 to 100%). The findings underscore that Chat-GPT shows promise as a clinical support tool but requires structured prompts for accuracy and should not replace clinical judgment or professional oversight.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsGuideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicStatus EpilepticusBenzodiazepinesElectroencephalographyGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansAnticonvulsantsBenzodiazepinesArtificial intelligenceChatGPTEmergencyGuidelinesNeurologyStatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID40877417
PMCPMC12394600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.