ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting thermal and electromagnetic performance of omndirectional magnetic field generators via figure of merit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Omnidirectional magnetic field generators, or Omnimagnets, are electromagnetic devices used for non-contact manipulation tasks. Supplying current to an Omnimagnet generates a magnetic field and generates Joule heating, which can cause overheating. Omnimagnets are thermally limited. Omnimagnet design currently relies on advanced thermal-electromagnetic simulations, which can vary widely between applications. Currently, there is no generalized understanding for coupled thermal-electromagnetic effects. This work addresses this knowledge gap by developing a universal framework for estimating Omnimagnet performance directly from the design and operating conditions. Scaling analysis is used to determine the coupling between thermal and electromagnetic effects in terms of design variables and base principles. The scaling relationships are used to define a figure of merit η where a higher η indicates a superior design. Equations are fitted to simulated Omnimagnet performance for multiple cooling mechanisms (convection, radiation) and different electromagnetic priorities (dipole moment m, m/mass). Quantitative relationships are developed that can predict Omnimagnet performance across a spectrum of designs without requiring advanced thermal and electromagnetic simulations (i.e. [Formula: see text] 530[Formula: see text] for convectively-cooled Omnimagnets, where [Formula: see text] is the figure of merit). The figure of merit η can also be used to gauge Omnimagnet performance for new applications, as is shown for power-sensitive Omnimagnets. Using this methodology, non-experts can use a figure of merit to streamline the design of Omnimagnets for new or existing use cases. The methodology is broadly applicable for the design of similar electromagnetic devices such as electrical motors, generators, and electromagnets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.