Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877377›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Sepsis detection in hematologic and solid tumor malignancies using quantitative inflammatory biomarker differences in a prospective single center study.

Daniela Carcò, Valeria Iachelli, Uros Markovic, Giulia Chisari, Federica Galbo, Dorotea Sciacca, Luca Giaimi, Paolo Castorina, Emanuele Martorana

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Predictors of Mortality inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Recent advances in early screening and diagnosis of sepsis: a narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniela CarcòIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy.
Valeria IachelliLaboratorio di Patologia Clinica, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale, Siracusa, Italy.
Uros MarkovicDivision of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Catania, Italy.
Giulia ChisariIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy.
Federica GalboIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy.
Dorotea SciaccaIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy.
Luca GiaimiIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy.
Paolo CastorinaIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy.
Emanuele MartoranaIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy. emanuele@martorana.email.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition triggered by a dysregulated immune response to bloodstream infection. Patients with solid and hematologic malignancies are at increased risk of severe infections and the onset of sepsis. Due to the limitations of blood cultures, particularly in culture-negative sepsis, multiple serological biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes (LYM), neutrophils (NEU), and monocytes (MON), are frequently used to diagnose infections. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy of these biomarkers in distinguishing sepsis in patients with hematologic and solid tumors. It was observed that hematologic cancer patients exhibited significantly elevated IL-6, PCT, and MON levels, indicating their strong potential for sepsis detection. However, this difference was not statistically significant in patients with solid cancers and sepsis. Specifically, patients with blood cancer at the onset of sepsis have elevated levels of IL-6, PCT and MON, with AUCs exceeding 0.75, indicating strong predictive value. In contrast, patients with solid tumors had a moderate but not statistically significant increase in PCT (AUC = 0.693). Biomarker combinations enhanced the diagnostic power for hematologic cancers, but their performance in solid tumors remained limited. The findings underscore the need for cancer-specific sepsis diagnostic approaches, with a particular focus on the unique immune dynamics of hematologic versus solid tumors.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasmsSepsisAdultAgedC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedProcalcitoninProspective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinInterleukin-6ProcalcitoninComposite biomarker indexHematologic cancerSepsisSerum biomarkersSolid cancer

Identifiers

PMID40877377
PMCPMC12394397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.