ArticleScientific reports2025
Physics-informed residual learning with spatiotemporal local support for inverse ECG reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Forward Problem in Electrocardiographic Imaging.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Clinically Oriented Review with Engineering Primers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful framework for modeling complex physical systems by embedding governing equations into the learning process. For example, PINNs offer a promising approach to solving the inverse electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) problem, which aims to reconstruct heart-surface electrical activity from body-surface potential measurements. However, existing PINN-based ECGI models face several challenges, including overfitting to sparsely sampled collocation points, unstable training dynamics, and limited network scalability-particularly when applied to high-dimensional spatiotemporal data. In this study, we propose a novel learning framework, i.e., physics-informed residual learning with spatiotemporal local support, to address these limitations. The method introduces two key innovations: (1) a numerical differentiation scheme that approximates spatial and temporal derivatives using local neighborhood information, enabling coherent spatiotemporal constraint enforcement, and (2) an adaptive residual network architecture with trainable skip connections that stabilizes optimization and improves model expressiveness. Experimental results on simulated body-heart geometries show that our method substantially outperforms traditional regularization-based inverse ECG approaches and previous PINN models, achieving higher reconstruction accuracy and improved robustness to sensor noise. This work advances the methodological foundation of broader implications for data-constrained modeling in complex dynamical systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.