ArticleScientific reports2025
Knotless backstitching provides comparable strength to conventional knotting in porcine stomach suture biomechanics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this biomechanics study, we compared the use of knot fixation or backstitching at the end of a continuous suture with the use of conventional absorbable sutures to close a porcine stomach incision. We then evaluated whether the backstitching method could be considered a novel, surgical, knot-free closure technique. A total of 40 suturing samples were obtained and divided into 20 samples from the posterior wall and 20 from the anterior wall. These sets of 20 samples were then randomly grouped into the backstitching group and the knotting group, with 10 samples per group for each associated wall. Biomechanical tests were performed to compare the maximum load and tensile stiffness differences between the backstitching group and the knotting group. The maximum load and tensile stiffness differences between the backstitching group and the knotting group were not significant for the posterior or anterior walls of the porcine stomach. The use of backstitching at the end of an incision with continuous conventional absorbable sutures provides similar biomechanical properties to those of knot fixation, and the backstitching method shows promise as a novel surgical knot-free closure technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.