ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on the dynamic changes and influencing factors of the new urbanization level in Counties of China's revolutionary old areas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Counties represent a crucial spatial unit for achieving integrated urban-rural development and coordinated regional development. Promoting new urbanization(NU) at the county level in special-type regions such as revolutionary old base areas is an important pathway to realizing this goal. From the perspective of the Main Functional Zoning framework, this study selects 617 counties across 12 revolutionary old base areas in China as research units. An evaluation index system for new urbanization is constructed, and methods such as the Dagum Gini coefficient and geodetector are employed to reveal the spatial patterns and dynamic changes in county-level new urbanization from 2010 to 2020, as well as to explore the main influencing factors behind its spatial differentiation.The results indicate: (1) From 2010 to 2020, the level of new urbanization in county areas of revolutionary old base areas continued to rise, with an average annual growth rate of 8.59%. Counties with high urbanization levels were mainly concentrated in the Taihang Revolutionary Old Base Area, the Yimeng Revolutionary Old Base Area, and the Hailufeng Revolutionary Old Base Area. Additionally, urban districts and county-level cities with better development foundations also exhibited relatively higher urbanization indices.(2)From the perspective of Main Functional Zones, in both 2010 and 2020, the level of new urbanization followed the order key development zones > major grain-producing areas > key ecological function zones. However, the growth rate showed the opposite trend. The relative disparities between different Main Functional Zones have narrowed over time.(3) Natural conditions, human capital, socio-economic factors, policy support, and locational factors jointly shape the spatial pattern of new urbanization in revolutionary old base areas. Among these, socio-economic factors-represented by indicators such as rural residents' disposable income and per capita GDP-as well as human capital, play a dominant role, with significant differences observed across various Main Functional Zones.This study offers theoretical insights and policy implications for promoting differentiated and distinctive new urbanization pathways in county areas of revolutionary old base regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.