Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877366›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Resource use of dusky and Galapagos sharks in response to fishing activities at a remote Pacific Island.

Jordan K Matley, Lauren Meyer, Chloe N Roberts, Thomas M Clarke, Mark Scott, Adam Barnett, Charlie Huveneers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jordan K MatleyCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. jordan.matley@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4286-597X
Lauren MeyerCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0374-9941
Chloe N RobertsCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8863-1176
Thomas M ClarkeCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3342-7671
Mark ScottNorfolk Island National Park, Burnt Pine, NF, 2899, Australia.
Adam BarnettBiopixel Oceans Foundation, Cairns, 4878, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7430-8428
Charlie HuveneersCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-1358

Funding

Australian Government 4-HANQ6UL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharks often modify their behaviour to obtain food from humans. Food provisioning can lead to behavioural conditioning, which can alter resource use patterns and interactions within and between species. We used acoustic telemetry and dietary biomarkers (fatty acids and stable isotopes) to quantify dusky (Carcharhinus obscurus; n = 18) and Galapagos (C. galapagensis; n = 16) shark associations with fishing piers at Norfolk Island, Australia between 2021 and 2024. Individuals visited the piers, on average, once every four days (~ 3 h daily), with dusky sharks usually arriving in the early afternoon and staying until dusk while Galapagos sharks arrived at dusk and left in the early morning. Despite this temporal partitioning, the diets of both species were indistinguishable from each other and showed only limited contribution of discarded fish; however, fish scraps were more common in the diet of sharks with high residency to the piers. These findings indicate that although incidental feeding contributes to the presence of sharks at the piers, it has likely not markedly altered natural foraging behaviour with regular visits to the piers only conducted intermittently by a subset of the tagged population to supplement diet. Understanding how sharks use the piers in response to human activities will help assess current waste disposal practices at Norfolk Island and ongoing monitoring needs.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHuman-Animal InteractionHuntingSharksAnimalsHumansPacific IslandsAcoustic telemetryCompetitionFatty acidsNiche partitioningSeamountsStable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID40877366
PMCPMC12394560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.