ArticleScientific reports2025
Resource use of dusky and Galapagos sharks in response to fishing activities at a remote Pacific Island.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-method approach to characterising dynamic human-shark interactions at a remote oceanic island.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sharks often modify their behaviour to obtain food from humans. Food provisioning can lead to behavioural conditioning, which can alter resource use patterns and interactions within and between species. We used acoustic telemetry and dietary biomarkers (fatty acids and stable isotopes) to quantify dusky (Carcharhinus obscurus; n = 18) and Galapagos (C. galapagensis; n = 16) shark associations with fishing piers at Norfolk Island, Australia between 2021 and 2024. Individuals visited the piers, on average, once every four days (~ 3 h daily), with dusky sharks usually arriving in the early afternoon and staying until dusk while Galapagos sharks arrived at dusk and left in the early morning. Despite this temporal partitioning, the diets of both species were indistinguishable from each other and showed only limited contribution of discarded fish; however, fish scraps were more common in the diet of sharks with high residency to the piers. These findings indicate that although incidental feeding contributes to the presence of sharks at the piers, it has likely not markedly altered natural foraging behaviour with regular visits to the piers only conducted intermittently by a subset of the tagged population to supplement diet. Understanding how sharks use the piers in response to human activities will help assess current waste disposal practices at Norfolk Island and ongoing monitoring needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.