Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877365›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multiple model visual feature embedding and selection method for an efficient pest classification supporting precision agriculture.

Vikas Khullar, Isha Kansal, Shyama Barna Bhattacharjee, Zarin Tasneem, Nitin Goyal, Shirina Samreen, Sachin Kumar Gupta, Shubham Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vikas KhullarChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Isha KansalChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India.
Shyama Barna BhattacharjeeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of Science and Technology Chittagong (USTC), Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Zarin TasneemDepartment of Allied Science (Mathematics), Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology (FSET), University of Science and Technology Chittagong (USTC), Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Nitin GoyalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, Haryana, India.
Shirina SamreenDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia. s.samreen@mu.edu.sa.
Sachin Kumar GuptaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Central University of Jammu, Samba, Jammu, (UT of J&K), 181143, India.
Shubham MahajanAmity School of Engineering & Technology, Amity University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. mahajanshubham2232579@gmail.com.

Funding

Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia 1255-689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture 5.0 is a principal economic activity in the world with major workforce dependent crops cultivation. An automated system for crops field insect pest identification can help decrease labour, while also improving the speed and precision in compared to manual methods. Less computation and memory systems are getting utilized for remote deployments of classification systems. In this paper, efficient pretrained multiple deep learning models based visual feature extraction and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) based feature selection to provide high efficacy with light resource requirements. This proposed approach also able to handle large number of classes. To achieve this, diverse pest datasets were combined including 9 and 12 classes respectively and the utilized combined dataset contains total 19 classes. Methodology of proposed system included the selection of multiple pretrained models including DenseNet201, EfficientNetB3 and InceptionResNetV2 based on less memory and less parametric requirements. The second last layer of mentioned models have been utilized for selection of features as DenseNet201, EfficientNetB3 and InceptionResNetV2 resulted 1920, 1536 and 4608 accordingly. The extracted features combined and selected using LDA according to the number of classes. At end a basic light dense neural network have been deployed for classification. This makes a low resource and high efficacy pest classification model for higher number of classes. The results obtained by proposed technique are 99.99% Accuracy, 100% validation, 99.99% Recall and negligible Loss. Further the proposed system has been analysed and compared with benchmark approaches including transfer learning and single model feature extraction and selection approach. The main advantage of our proposed hybrid feature selection is that it makes the classification process lighter because it involves selecting relevant features from the existing dataset without training additional models, whereas transfer learning typically involves retraining or fine-tuning pre-existing models, which can be more computationally intensive. Overall the proposed system and approach resulting higher results with lighter process resources that fitted better in the development of domain of precision agriculture.

Indexed as

AgricultureInsectaAlgorithmsAnimalsCrops, AgriculturalDeep LearningDiscriminant AnalysisNeural Networks, ComputerCrop protectionFeature selectionPest classificationPrecision agriculturePretrained deep learningSmart farming

Identifiers

PMID40877365
PMCPMC12394682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.