ArticleScientific reports2025
Cardiac myosin-binding protein-C levels are associated with severity and prognosis in stable coronary artery disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: From Sarcomeric Injury Biology to Decision-Grade Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biomarker Profiling of Cardiac Causes for Chest Pain in Non-acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in West Virginia.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While cardiac myosin-binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) is a promising biomarker for acute coronary syndrome, its clinical utility in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly defined. To investigate the association of cMyBP-C with the presence and angiographic severity of stable CAD, and to evaluate its prognostic value for 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). This study enrolled 367 patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected CAD. We performed a cross-sectional analysis for CAD presence and severity (quantified by Gensini score [GS]) and a prospective follow-up of stable CAD patients for 1-year MACEs. Of 367 patients, cMyBP-C levels were significantly higher in those with stable CAD (n = 195) versus non-CAD (n = 172) (median 28.0 vs. 6.0 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and correlated positively with GS (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, cMyBP-C was an independent predictor of both CAD presence (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.08) and severe CAD (GS ≥ 18) (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04; both P < 0.001). The area under the curve for predicting CAD presence and severity was 0.827 and 0.778, respectively. In the prognostic cohort of 190 stable CAD patients, 56 MACEs (29.5%) occurred. As the proportional hazards assumption was violated, an Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model was used. This model confirmed that a high cMyBP-C level (≥ 27 pg/ml) was independently associated with an accelerated time to MACEs (Acceleration Factor 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94, P = 0.02). Circulating cMyBP-C is an independent predictor for the presence and angiographic severity of stable CAD, and an elevated level identifies patients at higher risk for 1-year MACEs. While these single-center findings require confirmation in larger, external validation cohorts, they position cMyBP-C as a promising biomarker for comprehensive risk stratification in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.