Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877328›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The role of harmonicity on listeners' ability to hear out voices in polyphonic music.

Lisanne G Bogaard, Juraj Mesik, Andrew J Oxenham

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Auditory scene analysis in music: A synthetic review.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisanne G BogaardDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA. bogaa002@umn.edu.
Juraj MesikDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Andrew J OxenhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.

Funding

Complex Pitch Perception in Complex EnvironmentsR01DC005216 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Andrew J. Oxenham · 2002 to 2026
$9.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005216NIH HHS R01DC005216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While speech perception amidst competing talkers is well-studied, the perception of polyphonic music remains less explored. Pitch differences aid in source segregation, yet reductions in harmonicity have relatively little effect on speech intelligibility in such conditions. We hypothesized that source identification and segregation in music would rely more on harmonicity, given the central role of pitch in music and fewer alternative segregation cues, such as temporal incoherence. Polyphonic vocal passages from a female singer were generated from four-second MIDI excerpts of existing music. Inharmonic versions were created by introducing random frequency deviations within the first 30 harmonics of each note. Timbral cues were minimized by using a single source for all voices. Experiment 1 tested participants' ability to estimate the number of voices in passages with one to five simultaneous voices. Experiment 2 tested participants' ability to follow one voice within a two- to five-voice passage. Both experiments varied the degree of inharmonicity. Accuracy decreased with increasing inharmonicity and voice count but remained above chance in all conditions. The results confirm the importance of harmonicity in source segregation within music but show that some segregation abilities remain, even when timbral cues are removed and harmonicity is severely degraded.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMusicPitch PerceptionSpeech PerceptionVoiceAcoustic StimulationAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAuditory streamingHarmonicityMusic perceptionPitch

Identifiers

PMID40877328
PMCPMC12394604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.