Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877313›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures in solar power prediction.

Montaser Abdelsattar, Mohamed A Azim, Ahmed AbdelMoety, Ahmed Emad-Eldeen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Montaser AbdelsattarElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena, 83523, Egypt. Montaser.A.Elsattar@eng.svu.edu.eg.
Mohamed A AzimDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Cyber Sciences, University of Prince Mugrin, Medina, 42241, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AbdelMoetyElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena, 83523, Egypt.
Ahmed Emad-EldeenRenewable Energy Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Postgraduate Studies for Advanced Sciences (PSAS), Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62511, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating renewable energy sources into the electricity grid requires accurate forecasts of solar power production. With the aim of enhancing the accuracy and reliability of forecasts, this study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of eight state-of-the-art Deep Learning (DL) architectures-Autoencoder, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Simple Recurrent Neural Network (SimpleRNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), Transformer, and Lightweight Informer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting (InformerLite)-applied to solar power prediction using a dataset with 4,200 historical records and 20 meteorological and astronomical features. A comprehensive assessment of Root Mean Squared Error [Formula: see text], Mean Absolute Error [Formula: see text], Mean Absolute Percentage Error [Formula: see text], and Coefficient of Determination [Formula: see text] metrics was performed on the training, validation, and test datasets. The TCN model had the greatest performance across all models, achieving a test R² of 0.7786, an [Formula: see text] of 429.4863, and a balanced relative standard deviation ([Formula: see text]) of 0.6827, so exhibiting an exceptional capacity to capture temporal patterns. The Autoencoder achieved a [Formula: see text] of 0.7648 and had the greatest overall performance on the entire dataset, resulting in a Whole [Formula: see text] of 0.8437. In contrast, the Transformer model demonstrated significantly poorer performance (Test [Formula: see text] = 0.0714), underscoring its limitations in this context without any architectural modifications. This study not only demonstrates the best DL models for solar power forecasting as qualified by useful statistical metrics, but also provides a scalable, interpretable, and extensible forecasting framework for real-world energy systems. The findings verify the informed DL integration to smart grid scenarios, laying the foundations for further developments in hybrid modeling, multi-horizon prediction, and deployment in resource-constrained environments with limited computational power and resources.

Indexed as

Deep learningEnergy predictionRenewable energySolar forecasting

Identifiers

PMID40877313
PMCPMC12394563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.