ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures in solar power prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Horizon Delay Asymmetry Prediction and Compensation for IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol on Copper and Fiber Links by Means of Ground-Truth Measurements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing photovoltaic efficiency in arid climates using cooling strategies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design of a robust neural network-based controller for frequency stability in microgrids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- LSTM-Based Estimation of Solar Energy Production Using Meteorological and Environmental Data: Karabük Case Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A stacked Gradient Boosting-XGBoost ensemble with ridge meta-learner for accurate short-term solar PV power forecasting in smart grids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cross-dataset benchmarking of machine learning models for marine and atmospheric environmental prediction.PloS one · 2026Article
- Physically aligned forest fire risk prediction: A deep learning framework coupling fuel and climate multivariate factors.PloS one · 2026Article
- Very short-term production prediction for photovoltaic plants using Temporal Convolutional Networks.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating renewable energy sources into the electricity grid requires accurate forecasts of solar power production. With the aim of enhancing the accuracy and reliability of forecasts, this study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of eight state-of-the-art Deep Learning (DL) architectures-Autoencoder, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Simple Recurrent Neural Network (SimpleRNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN), Transformer, and Lightweight Informer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting (InformerLite)-applied to solar power prediction using a dataset with 4,200 historical records and 20 meteorological and astronomical features. A comprehensive assessment of Root Mean Squared Error [Formula: see text], Mean Absolute Error [Formula: see text], Mean Absolute Percentage Error [Formula: see text], and Coefficient of Determination [Formula: see text] metrics was performed on the training, validation, and test datasets. The TCN model had the greatest performance across all models, achieving a test R² of 0.7786, an [Formula: see text] of 429.4863, and a balanced relative standard deviation ([Formula: see text]) of 0.6827, so exhibiting an exceptional capacity to capture temporal patterns. The Autoencoder achieved a [Formula: see text] of 0.7648 and had the greatest overall performance on the entire dataset, resulting in a Whole [Formula: see text] of 0.8437. In contrast, the Transformer model demonstrated significantly poorer performance (Test [Formula: see text] = 0.0714), underscoring its limitations in this context without any architectural modifications. This study not only demonstrates the best DL models for solar power forecasting as qualified by useful statistical metrics, but also provides a scalable, interpretable, and extensible forecasting framework for real-world energy systems. The findings verify the informed DL integration to smart grid scenarios, laying the foundations for further developments in hybrid modeling, multi-horizon prediction, and deployment in resource-constrained environments with limited computational power and resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.