Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877290›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Sensing multi-directional forces at superresolution using taxel value isoline theory.

Huanbo Sun, Adam Spiers, Hyosang Lee, Jonathan Fiene, Georg Martius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huanbo SunMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany. huanbo.sun@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-5776
Adam SpiersMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Hyosang LeeMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8984-7870
Jonathan FieneMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.
Georg MartiusMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany. georg.martius@uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robots can benefit from touch perception for enhanced interaction. Interaction involves tactile sensing devices, contact objects, and complex directional force motions (normal and shear) in between. We introduce a comprehensive theory unifying them to advance sensor design, explain shear-induced performance drops, and suggest application scenarios. Our theory, based on sensor isolines, achieves superresolution sensing with sparse units, avoiding dense layouts. Through structural analysis of the sensor perception field, force sensitivity, and contact object effects, we also explore the force direction influences: normal, tangential shear, and radial shear forces. The model predicts an inherent accuracy reduction under shear forces compared to pure normal forces. Validation used Barodome, a 3D sensor predicting contact locations and decoupling shear/normal forces. Its performance confirmed the significant impact of shear forces, with observed drops (0.5 mm) closely matching theoretical predictions (0.33 mm). This theory provides valuable guidance for future tactile sensor design and advanced robotic touch systems.

Identifiers

PMID40877290
PMCPMC12394483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.