Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877289›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Fire risk to structures in California's Wildland-Urban Interface.

Maryam Zamanialaei, Daniel San Martin, Maria Theodori, Dwi Marhaendro Jati Purnomo, Ali Tohidi, Chris Lautenberger, Yiren Qin, Arnaud Trouvé, Michael Gollner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maryam ZamanialaeiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5205-7955
Daniel San MartinDepartamento de Informática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile.
Maria TheodoriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Dwi Marhaendro Jati PurnomoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ali TohidiDepartment of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7511-9274
Chris LautenbergerCloudFire Inc., Auburn, CA, USA.
Yiren QinDepartment of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Arnaud TrouvéDepartment of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Michael GollnerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. mgollner@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6925-4020

Funding

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Gordon E. and Betty I. Moore Foundation) 11999National Science Foundation (NSF) 1854952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The destructive impacts of wildfires on people, property and the environment have dramatically increased, especially in the Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) in California. In these areas structures are threatened by both approaching flames and lofted embers which spread fire into and within communities. While independent factors influencing structure fire protection are well known, their combined effects remain largely unquantified, limiting the accuracy of risk assessments and mitigation strategies. Here, we examine five major historical WUI fires-2017 Tubbs, 2017 Thomas, 2018 Camp, 2019 Kincade, and 2020 Glass Fires-utilizing machine learning (ML) analysis of on-the-ground post-fire data collection, remotely sensed data, and fire reconstruction modeling to assess patterns of structure loss and mitigation effectiveness. We show that the spacing between structures is a critical factor influencing fire risk, highlighting the importance of structure arrangement, while fire exposure, the ignition resistance (hardening) of structures, and clearing around structures (defensible space) work in combination to mediate fire risk. Utilizing an XGBoost classifier, structure survivability can be predicted to 82% accuracy. Results highlight the effectiveness of hardening and defensible space, with a hypothetical 52% reduction in losses. Our findings emphasize the need for community-level mitigation to reduce structure loss in future WUI fires.

Indexed as

FiresWildfiresCaliforniaCitiesHumansMachine LearningRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID40877289
PMCPMC12394485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.