ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Advancing paroxetine treatment in depression: predicting remission and plasma concentration, and validating and updating therapeutic reference ranges.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response: a focused review on CYP2C19, CYP2D6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A polymorphisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing paroxetine therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD) requires effective prediction models for treatment efficacy and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This study aimed to develop prediction models for treatment remission and steady-state concentration (Css) of paroxetine, elucidate the role of CYP2D6 activity score (AS) in predicting Css, establish associations between adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and Css, and validate and update the therapeutic reference range (TRR) for patients with MDD in the Han Chinese population. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of an 8-week multicenter prospective cohort study involving 530 Han Chinese patients with MDD. Logistic regression models were developed to predict treatment remission at the eighth week and Css as a binary variable (within/outside TRR of 20-65 ng/ml). The model for predicting treatment remission demonstrated an AUC of 0.707, while the model for Css achieved an AUC of 0.615. Associations between ADRs and Css were assessed using logistic regression, adjusted for sex and age. Patients with Css within 20-65 ng/ml were more likely to achieve remission (OR = 1.655, 95% CI: 1.109-2.489) and less likely to experience ADRs (OR = 0.460, 95% CI: 0.203-0.961). Additionally, those with lower AS were more likely to maintain Css within this range (OR = 0.638, 95% CI: 0.461-0.878). ROC analysis further established an updated TRR of 20.8-52.5 ng/ml considering both treatment remission and ADRs. Our findings enhance paroxetine treatment and monitoring, underscoring the potential of CYP2D6 AS and Css as predictors for Css and treatment remission, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.