Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877160›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Ole Jung, Kim Burckhardt, Sebastian Stammkoetter, Marina Macias Barrientos, Cindy Reinholdt, Tonya Andreeva, Milena Radenković Stošić, Sanja Stojanović, Stevo Najman, Rumen Krastev and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ole JungClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Kim BurckhardtClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Sebastian StammkoetterChair of Materials Test Engineering (WPT), TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Marina Macias BarrientosChair of Materials Test Engineering (WPT), TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Cindy ReinholdtClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Tonya AndreevaFaculty of Life Sciences, Reutlingen University, Reutlingen, Germany.
Milena Radenković StošićScientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Sanja StojanovićScientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Stevo NajmanScientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Department for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Rumen KrastevFaculty of Life Sciences, Reutlingen University, Reutlingen, Germany.
Frank WaltherChair of Materials Test Engineering (WPT), TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Sven Pantermehl *Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Mike Barbeck *Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany; mike.barbeck@med.uni-rostock.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe aim of the present research is a comprehensive evaluation of a fish-collagen based wound membrane using established MATERIALS AND

methodsScanning electron microscopy (SEM) and attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) analysis were initially used to analyze the structure and collagen molecular structure. Also, a comparison of protein adsorption

resultsThe SEM analysis showed differences in the structure and the porosity of both membranes. The analysis

conclusionThe results of this study highlight the potential of fish collagen membranes as biocompatible wound healing materials. However, their rapid degradation presents a challenge that needs to be addressed through targeted modifications, such as optimized cross-linking.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCollagenWound HealingAdsorptionAnimalsCattleCell ProliferationCell SurvivalFishesHumansMaterials TestingMembranes, ArtificialPericardiumSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSwineBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenMembranes, ArtificialbiocompatibilitycytocompatibilityFish collagenin vivowound membrane

Identifiers

PMID40877160
PMCPMC12396050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.