ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2025
Leveraging the American Housing Survey to Quantify Risk and Resilience.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging the American Housing Survey to Quantify Risk and Resilience.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combined trends of urbanization and climate change elevate the criticality of planning resilience against natural hazards in urban areas, but quantifying key metrics and responses for planning purposes has proven elusive. A key need for cutting-edge quantitative research in urban resilience is datasets that are large and detailed but also broadly applicable to different settings and questions. The goal of this paper is to introduce an infrequently used dataset in the risk science field-the U.S. Census Bureau's American Housing Survey (AHS). We evaluate the pros and cons of the AHS and highlight specific examples of how researchers can use the dataset to advance goals toward more resilient urban futures. Using predictive models and multiple dimension reduction, we evaluate spatial and temporal trends within and between cities, and we investigate relationships between often disparate variables (e.g., socio-demographic and built environment) for anticipating negative consequences of hazards and perceived risk. In so doing, we demonstrate the usefulness of AHS's longitudinal nature, cross-city data, varying climatic regions, and broad range of variables for risk scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.