Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877116›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2025

Leveraging the American Housing Survey to Quantify Risk and Resilience.

Kendrick Hardaway, Kelsea Best, Benjamin Rachunok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Leveraging the American Housing Survey to Quantify Risk and Resilience.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kendrick HardawayCivil and Environmental Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8391-3282
Kelsea BestCivil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9040-6244
Benjamin RachunokEdward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6405-978X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combined trends of urbanization and climate change elevate the criticality of planning resilience against natural hazards in urban areas, but quantifying key metrics and responses for planning purposes has proven elusive. A key need for cutting-edge quantitative research in urban resilience is datasets that are large and detailed but also broadly applicable to different settings and questions. The goal of this paper is to introduce an infrequently used dataset in the risk science field-the U.S. Census Bureau's American Housing Survey (AHS). We evaluate the pros and cons of the AHS and highlight specific examples of how researchers can use the dataset to advance goals toward more resilient urban futures. Using predictive models and multiple dimension reduction, we evaluate spatial and temporal trends within and between cities, and we investigate relationships between often disparate variables (e.g., socio-demographic and built environment) for anticipating negative consequences of hazards and perceived risk. In so doing, we demonstrate the usefulness of AHS's longitudinal nature, cross-city data, varying climatic regions, and broad range of variables for risk scientists.

Indexed as

big dataclimate changecommunity resiliencehousingnatural hazardsrisk

Identifiers

PMID40877116
PMCPMC12663901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.