ArticleJournal of fish biology2025
Structural and developmental insights into the muscles involved in lionfish (Pterois spp.) vocalisations.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re-evaluating the putative sonic role of the retractor dorsalis in lionfishes.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Structural and developmental insights into the muscles involved in lionfish (Pterois spp.) vocalisations.Journal of fish biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vocal signalling is an important mode of communication in fishes. The two species of lionfish in the Pterois complex, the Indo-Pacific lionfish (Pterois volitans) and the red lionfish (Pterois miles), are both known to produce different types of sounds with sonic muscles attached to the swimbladder. However, the specific mechanism and the functions of these vocalisations in these invasive species are still unknown. We used three-dimensional bioimaging to describe the anatomy of the sonic muscles of both species. We further quantified the muscles of P. volitans to specifically explore how muscles developed across ontogeny and to test the hypothesis that sonic muscles would show sexual dimorphism if they were a sexually selected trait. Both P. volitans and P. miles showed a physoclistous swimbladder with a bilaterally symmetric pair of extrinsic sonic swimbladder muscles (ESSMs), which have been suggested to control buoyancy and generate vocalisations. Both species also displayed an additional pair of anterior extrinsic muscles, which projected dorsoventrally from the spinal column and inserted onto the anterior wall of the swimbladder, potentially also having a role in sound production. Both types of sonic muscles were present across ontogeny. Quantification of the posterior belly of the ESSMs in P. volitans showed that both the length and mass of these muscles in both mature and immature individuals increased linearly with body size. There were no ontogenetic or sex differences in sonic muscle investment between individuals. Given the primary function of these muscles is to control the swimbladder for buoyancy, this may constrain the modification of these muscles relative to body size, or they may have no differences in their acoustic function between sexes or across ontogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.