ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
In Utero MR Imaging for Fetuses with Small Head Sizes without Intracranial Abnormalities Detected on Ultrasonography.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMany studies have shown that in utero MR imaging (iuMRI) is a valuable adjunct to ultrasonography studies (USS) when a brain abnormality has been shown on USS. There is an increasing tendency, however, for fetal maternal experts to use iuMRI in fetuses with small heads but no evident brain abnormality on USS. The diagnostic and clinical value for that approach is not known at present, and the aim of this study is to close that gap in medical knowledge. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe recruited 200 women whose fetuses had small head sizes but no brain abnormality on USS, to assess the rate and type of intracranial abnormalities found on iuMRI. A retrospective analysis was made of the change in prognosis brought about by iuMRI-derived abnormalities. The relationship between the fetal head circumference measured on USS and the rate of brain abnormalities shown on iuMRI was also assessed to perform sensitivity/specificity analyses.
resultsIntracranial abnormalities were present on iuMRI in 21/200 (10.5%; 95% CI, 7.0-15.5%) fetuses, and changes in prognosis were brought about (all worsened) following iuMRI in 16/21 (76.2%). There was an increased chance of an intracranial abnormality being present in fetuses with more severe reductions in head size.
conclusionsThere is a high detection rate of intracranial abnormalities on iuMRI of fetuses with small head sizes (10.5%). In most cases, the intracranial abnormalities shown on iuMRI brought about a change in prognosis. There was an increased risk of intracranial abnormalities in fetuses with more severe reductions in head size. These data make a strong case in favor of offering iuMRI to women whose fetuses haves a small head size but no intracranial abnormality on USS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.