ArticleBMJ open quality2025
'Alone on our NF1 island': a patient-led mixed-method survey study to understand the care pathway for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients in the UK.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The social construction of the "good doctor": Expectations of physicians among adults with NF1.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- "Let it be as it is": between shock and acceptance - emotional, identity, and cognitive responses to the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type1.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Patient perceptions of pituitary incidentaloma diagnosis and follow-up: a Pituitary Society international patient survey.Pituitary · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a rare genetic disorder characterised by neurofibroma growth, affects approximately 25 000 individuals in the UK. Its wide range of clinical manifestations presents significant challenges in providing comprehensive care for patients. In agreement with National Health Service England's Commissioners, Childhood Tumour Trust initiated a patient-led service evaluation to understand existing care pathways and identify factors influencing patient satisfaction.
methodsThe study was coproduced with patient charities, clinicians and the Patient Led Research Hub. Online surveys were composed for patients, families, carers (PFCs) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) and disseminated through charity and healthcare networks. Structured features were analysed using descriptive statistics to review pathways and examine correlations with care satisfaction. Free-text responses were coded and analysed thematically to explore PFCs' and HPCs' experiences.
resultsA total of 1083 PFC and 94 HCP responses were received from across the UK (783 and 49 were complete, respectively). Overall, 54% PFCs expressed dissatisfaction with NF1 care. While London had a significantly higher satisfaction rate (64%; p=0.01) than the national average, Scotland (30%, p=0.01) and Northern Ireland (16%, p=0.01) had significantly lower rates. Influencing factors included poor care coordination, long specialist wait times and insufficient signposting to charities. Regarding diagnosis and management, 46 HCP roles, 35 referral routes and 16 sources of management guidelines were identified, indicating a lack of clear pathways and care standardisation. Free-text data revealed additional challenges, including limited education and information for families, low NF1 awareness among professionals, inequitable access to specialists and a desire for holistic care.
conclusionsThis evaluation revealed UK-wide dissatisfaction with NF1 care and a pressing need for system-level changes to improve regional disparities and care coordination, enhance patient education and HCP training and establish standardised pathways with a holistic model to enable high-quality equitable care for all NF1 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.