ArticleBMJ open2025
Improving outcome in SubaraChnoid HEMorrhage wIth nAdroparin (ISCHEMIA): a prospective randomised controlled trial protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04507178 (Improving Outcome in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage wIth Nadroparine), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Outcome in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage wIth Nadroparine
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microthrombi and hypercoagulability's contribution to delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe condition associated with significant morbidity and case fatality rate. Delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) is a major factor contributing to poor outcomes. For long, DCI was thought to be caused by vasospasm, induced by blood in the subarachnoid space. Growing experimental and clinical evidence has shown an activation of the coagulation cascade and several other (intravascular) pathophysiological pathways, affecting the cerebral microcirculation. In a retrospective analysis of our aSAH patient registry, we observed lower in-hospital mortality and a significantly higher rate of discharge-to-home in patients treated with high-dose nadroparin, compared with patients treated with low-dose (prophylactic) nadroparin. This observation suggests a potential benefit of higher doses of nadroparin in the acute course after aSAH. We therefore hypothesise that treatment with high-dose nadroparin will improve clinical outcome in endovascularly treated patients with aSAH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, prospective, phase II randomised controlled trial. From January 2022, all eligible patients will be recruited. 100 patients will be randomised to the intervention arm, that is, nadroparin two times per day 5700 AxaIU, or the control arm, that is, nadroparin once daily 2850 AxaIU in patients with body weight ≤100 kg or once daily 5700 AxaIU in patients with body weight >100 kg, both for up to 21 days. The trial includes a 6-month follow-up period. The primary objective is 30-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes include assessment of DCI, complications during admission, discharge location, clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale), quality of life and total healthcare costs at 3 and 6 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was obtained from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center (AMC) (MREC-number 2020_192), and recruitment has begun. The study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04507178.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.