ArticleBMJ open2025
Advance care planning in the perioperative setting: a mixed methods study of anaesthetists' knowledge, attitudes and practice.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) allows patients to detail their wishes in case they lose capacity. Despite low mortality rates, the high volume of surgery means that thousands of people die in the weeks and months following an operation. Perioperative ACP may benefit patients at high risk of complications and death by allowing them to discuss and document their priorities.
objectivesTo assess UK anaesthetists' knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding ACP and explore perceived barriers to perioperative ACP.
designExplanatory sequential mixed methods study, comprising a national online survey followed by qualitative interviews and observations. Data were integrated by using survey findings to shape the qualitative component, analysing both components for convergence and synthesising results into an explanatory narrative.
settingThe quantitative survey was distributed to anaesthetists across the UK. The qualitative component (interviews and direct observations) was conducted at a single central London teaching hospital.
participantsFor the survey, 534 anaesthetists were invited, with 184 (34%) responding. A minimum sample of 94 was required, determined by Cochran's formula. 14 consultant anaesthetists participated in semistructured interviews, and 40 hours of observations were conducted in preoperative assessment clinics and multidisciplinary meetings. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The quantitative outcome was anaesthetists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practice of ACP. The qualitative outcome was identification of barriers and facilitators to perioperative ACP through thematic analysis of interviews and observations.
resultsMost survey respondents (92%) endorsed ACP and 54% reported having an ACP discussion at least once every 6 months. Knowledge of ACP was found to be high with eight out of 10 questions answered correctly by the majority of respondents. While 78% indicated the run-up to major surgery is an appropriate time to discuss ACP, these conversations were not routinely integrated into practice. Qualitative findings highlighted three core reasons why treatment limitations are often not enacted perioperatively: (1) relatively low perceived postoperative mortality risk; (2) reversible nature of many surgical complications; and (3) the notion that if a patient truly requires treatment limitations, surgery may be inappropriate. Additional barriers included the focus on physical optimisation in pre-assessment clinics; a lack of clarity over the anaesthetist's role in leading these discussions; and an unclear role of the anaesthetist in the surgical pathway.
conclusionThis study is the first to systematically describe UK anaesthetists' ACP knowledge, attitudes and practice. Barriers include perceptions of low mortality risk, reversible complications, pre-assessment focus on physical health and cancellation avoidance, and an unclear role of the anaesthetist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.